since the founding of Google,

[rifattryo.ut11]

This is not new, but in this case, the employees said, "Extensive nondisclosure agreements prevented us from expressing concerns and the company may not be able to address them." What is your response to this? People are worried about retaliation. I don't want to talk about the stock issue because I know you apologized and corrected it. But if they have concerns, shouldn't they be allowed to express them? I know different people have different views. : Of course we think the debate is very important. It's also very important to be able to express these concerns publicly and discuss security issues.



We have been very open about the issue of disinformation japan cell phone number worked on early on. The technological progress in the past few years has been incredible and faster than expected, which has also increased people's general anxiety about society's readiness. We see where the science is going, so it's understandable that people are worried about the future. Specifically, the work we have done at Google and the way we have deployed these models, I think we have an excellent team, and we have deployed these models very safely, which I am very proud of.



Given the speed of technological advancement and our own progress, it is very important to focus on security and protection frameworks. We need to think about how to view the risks of training and deploying cutting-edge models. Moderator: How do you deal with him? I understand this dynamic. This happened at Google, early Microsoft, and Amazon. Things change as companies grow. Google was very chaotic in its early days. It went through so many that I can't even count them. There are so many people who have walked that path. This is normal, but how do you deal with it? For example, he invested in some foreign companies.